Skip to content
Kinnil vs SCADA vs MES

They're not the same — and they don't compete

A SCADA controls your process. An MES coordinates what gets produced. Kinnil measures how much you're losing and where. Confusing the three delays decisions; this page clears it up.

The three, side by side

KinnilSCADAMES
What it isReal-time measurement and monitoring: OEE, condition, energyProcess supervision and controlProduction execution management: orders, recipes, traceability
The question it answersWhere is my plant losing money?How do I control my process?What gets produced, when and with what?
Does it touch your process?Reads only by default; can execute actions under rules you defineYes — control is its jobDoesn't control machines; orchestrates the operation
Typical implementationDays, without touching your PLC or your networkEngineering project — typically monthsCorporate project — typically months or more
If you already have itKinnil coexists with it and complements it with measurementKinnil feeds it the real shop-floor data
Which one you need

Three different purchases for three different problems

You need Kinnil if…

You don't know for certain how much each machine produces, how long it stops and why. Measure first; everything else gets decided with that number.

You need a SCADA if…

Your process requires automatic control — valves, loops, sequences. And if you already have one, Kinnil doesn't replace it: it complements it.

You need an MES if…

Your pain is coordinating orders, recipes and traceability across systems. An MES without real shop-floor data plans blind — that's where Kinnil comes in.

The next step

It's not about buying anything.
It's about measuring your most problematic machine.

Kinnil Pilot · 30 days

We install on 1–2 machines, measure your real baseline and present the findings with your own data. Success criteria agreed from day one.

I'd rather write on WhatsApp →